Hannah Rose: complaint to the International Criminal Court

Nuremberg Code

Complaint to the International Criminal Court headed by Hannah Rose UK law firm and British scientist Dr Michael Yeadon, former chief scientific adviser to Pfizer. This is a really valuable document and clearly sets out point by point what is so wrong with the whole covid-19 and “vaccine” situation. 

BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT
(TREATY OF ROME STATUTE, ART. 15.1 AND 53)
Subject of complaint: – Violations of the Nuremberg Code – Violation of Article 6 of the Rome Statute – Violation of Article 7 of the Rome Statute – Violation of Article 8 of the Rome – Violation of Article 8 bis3 of the Rome Statute. Based on the extensive claims and enclosed documentation, we charge those responsible for numerous violations of the Nuremberg Code, crimes against humanity, war crimes and crimes of aggression in the United Kingdom, but not limited to individuals in these countries.

Perpetrators: Prime Minister for the United Kingdom BORIS JOHNSON, Chief Medical Officer for England and Chief Medical Adviser to the UK Government CHRISTOPHER WHITTY, (former) Secretary of State for Health and Social Care MATTHEW HANCOCK, (current) Secretary of State for Health and Social Care SAJID JAVID, Chief Executive of Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA… < — more– >

Visit this site to download the full document
UK ICC Complaint

This may appear at first glance to be nonsensical in the context of the Covid pandemic, but as far as the law is concerned, it is all about our sovereign right over our own body, and especially our right not to undergo medical experiments without our consent. The document sets out the grounds for prosecuting this under the Nuremberg Code.

It is likely that the court will have to consider evidence that
a) The UK’s vaccine programme is indeed an extension of a clinical trial, still experimental and being conducted without our knowledge or consent.
b) Whether the adverse reactions in the original trials were such that the trials should have been stopped.
This will be extremely difficult to assess, since the vaccines are protected by patents, and the manufacturers have a right to a certain amount of secrecy. Also, it will be difficult to prove any falsification of the adverse reaction statistics during the trials. The Complainants are asking for vaccine-injured individuals to come forward, since their evidence may be very important in the absence of full transparency from the pharmaceutical companies.

More information

www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/icc-court-case-hanna-rose-law